Legal Opinion
Keifer & Keifer v. Reconstruction Finance Corp.
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided February 27, 1939No. 364PublishedCited by 490 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Frankfurter
The Court took this case for review because an important question of federal law called for settlement, particularly in view of a conflict between the court below and the Supreme Court of Minnesota. Casper v. Regional Agricultural Credit Corp., 202 Minn. 433; 278 N. W. 896. The question is whether a Regional Agricultural Credit Corporation, in the- circumstances presently to be stated, is immune from suit.
On July 21, 1932, Congress enlarged the powers of the Reconstruction Finance Corporation (hereafter called “Reconstruction”) established early that year, Act oí January 22,1932, c. 8, 47…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- United States v. LeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- United Mine Workers v. Coronado Coal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Funk v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Principality of Monaco v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Helvering v. GerhardtSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by490 opinions
- United States v. SherwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- United States v. American Trucking AssociationsSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Dalehite v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Federal Crop Ins. Corp. v. MerrillSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- First National City Bank v. Banco Para El Comercio Exterior De CubaSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
485 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.