Legal Opinion

State v. Dagnall

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided May 27, 1999No. 98-2746-CRPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEich, J.

Todd D. Dagnall appeals from a judgment convicting him of first-degree intentional homicide. He argues that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress certain statements he made to police officers while being interrogated, claiming the statements were obtained in violation of his Sixth Amendment right to counsel. We agree with Dagnall that he properly invoked his right to counsel when initially contacted by the officers and that, as a result, any subsequent questioning was improper. We therefore reverse the judgment and remand to the circuit court with directions to grant…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Massiah v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Davis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. Michigan v. JacksonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Maine v. MoultonSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Patterson v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1988

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. WardWisconsin Supreme Court · 2009
  2. State v. DagnallWisconsin Supreme Court · 2000
  3. State v. HornungCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1999
  4. State v. DagnallWisconsin Supreme Court · 2000
  5. State v. ForbushWisconsin Supreme Court · 2011

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API