Legal Opinion

State v. Dagnall

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided July 6, 2000No. 98-2746-CRPublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDavid T. Prosser, J.

¶1. The State of Wisconsin (State) seeks review of a published decision of the court of appeals, State v. Dagnall, 228 Wis. 2d 495, 596 N.W.2d 482 (Ct. App. 1999). The court of appeals reversed a decision of the Circuit Court for Dane County, Patrick J. Fiedler, Judge, denying the motion of Todd D. Dagnall (Dagnall) to suppress incriminating statements he made to detectives. The circuit court held that the statements were not obtained in violation of the Sixth Amendment because Dagnall had not personally, unambiguously, and unequivocally invoked his right to counsel prior to answering…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  5. Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. State v. SamuelWisconsin Supreme Court · 2002
  2. State v. ForbushWisconsin Supreme Court · 2011
  3. State v. BadkerCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2000
  4. State v. ForbushCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2009
  5. State v. DarbyCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2009

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API