State v. Forbush
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1ConcurrenceDavid T. Prosser, J.
¶ 82. (concurring).
In 2000 the Wisconsin Supreme Court interpreted the Sixth Amendment right to counsel in the following circumstances: (1) the defendant had been charged with a crime; (2) counsel had been retained to represent the accused on that charge; (3) counsel informed law enforcement authorities about the representation and admonished them not to question the accused about the charge; and (4) both the law enforcement officers involved and the accused knew of the representation and discussed it. In these circumstances, the law enforcement officers continued to question the accused,…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- New York v. BeltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Arizona v. GantSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Michigan v. JacksonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.