State v. Hornung

James H. Hornung appeals a judgment, of conviction for three counts of sexual exploitation of a child, and one count each of child enticement and possession of child pornography, contrary to §§ 948.05(l)(a), 948.07(1) and 948.12, Stats., respectively. Hornung further appeals an order denying his postconviction suppression motion. Hornung argues that the trial court erred by denying his various motions to suppress certain statements and evidence obtained as the fruit of these statements. Hornung claims that the statements, made to police detectives during Hornung's interrogation, were obtained…