Bauer v. Armour & Co.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Gawthrop, J.,
Plaintiff sued to recover damages for alleged negligence resulting in injuries to his automobile and the loss of the use thereof. This appeal is from the judgment entered on a verdict in his favor. The assignments of error and statement of the questions involved present three propositions: 1. Was plaintiff guilty of con- tributary negligence as matter of law? 2. Was there competent proof of the cost of hiring another automobile while plaintiff’s machine was being repaired ? 3. Was the verdict against the law because it is in excess of the difference between the value of…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Price v. NewellSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1913
- Woomer v. Altoona & Logan Valley Electric Railway Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
- Yeager v. Winton Motor Carriage Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1915
- Rose v. Quaker City Cab Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1918
- Stevens v. Adams Express Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1913
3Cited by10 opinions
- Holt v. PariserSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
- Stone v. C. I. T. Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
- Horton v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
- Underberg v. StewartSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
- Wilk v. Mt. Oliver BoroughSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.