Legal Opinion

Woomer v. Altoona & Logan Valley Electric Railway Co.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 14, 1922No. Appeal, No. 109PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Gawthrop, J.,

Defendant appeals from a judgment entered on a verdict rendered against it in a suit in trespass for damages to plaintiff’s automobile truck resulting from a collision at a grade crossing. It complains that there was error: 1, in the charge; 2, in the refusal to enter judgment n. o. v. We shall consider these questions in their inverse order.

Looking at the evidence of plaintiff, and accepting as established by the verdict, every fact and every fair inference therefrom favorable to him, we deduce the following facts: Plaintiff was driving a heavy automobile truck, loaded…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Weber v. GreenebaumSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
  2. Ehrisman v. East Harrisburg City Passenger Railway Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1892
  3. Simon v. Lit Bros.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1919
  4. Burke v. Union Traction Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1901
  5. Mead v. Central Pennsylvania Traction Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1916

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Bauer v. Armour & Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  2. O'Connor v. Philadelphia Suburban Transportation Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
  3. Thornton Fuller Automobile Co. v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
  4. Leiser Gas Stove Co. v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
  5. Moraski v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API