Wilk v. Mt. Oliver Borough
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Keller, P. J.,
A reading of the evidence in this record satisfies us that the defendant’s negligence and the plaintiff’s contributory negligence were questions of fact for the jury, and that the verdict, which established the former and rejected the latter, was amply justified; in fact, we can find no warrant in the testimony to sustain any other verdict than for the plaintiff.
Margaret Street is a public highway in the Borough of Mt. Oliver, running in an easterly-westerly direction. It is paved with brick, except the last fifty feet at the extreme eastern end, which was opened for…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Rice v. HillSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
- Price v. NewellSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1913
- Bauer v. Armour & Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
- Crowley v. SnellenburgSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
- Horton v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Hoenstine v. RoseMontana Supreme Court · 1957