Underberg v. Stewart
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Trexler, J.,
The defendant was a garage keeper and had the plaintiff’s car in his charge. An employee of the defendant took the automobile from the garage and in driving it collided with a steel pillar of an elevated street railway and the car was ruined. The jury has settled the question that the plaintiff at no time had authorized any employee of the garage keeper to take out his car; in fact the testimony was to the effect that he had given explicit directions that no one should be allowed to touch the car, not even to wash it. We have already stated in Hare v. Mulligan, 77 Pa.…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Price v. NewellSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1913
- Bauer v. Armour & Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
- Vannatta v. TolliverSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
- Hare v. MulliganSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
3Cited by5 opinions
- Holt v. PariserSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
- Smith v. CohenSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
- Gordon v. GershmanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
- Crowley v. Service Garage, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1927
- Geisweit v. Marden, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lycoming County1954