Legal Opinion

Stone v. C. I. T. Corp.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 16, 1936No. Appeal, 27PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Baldrige, J.,

This action in trespass arose from a wrongful seizure of plaintiff’s car by defendant.

On November 7, 1931, the plaintiff, a vacuum cleaner salesman, purchased an automobile from Dohler Brothers, of Pittsburgh, for the sum of $995, under a dual contract of bailment and sale: Road Roller Co. v. Schlimme, 220 Pa. 413, 416, 69 A. 867. He received a credit of $465 for his old car and the balance of the purchase money was financed by the defendant, which charged him $94 for this service. There remained a balance of $624, which was to be paid in sixteen equal monthly…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Armstrong & Latta v. City of PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1915
  2. Linn v. Duquesne BoroughSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1903
  3. Duggan v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1893
  4. Commonwealth Trust Co. v. Hachmeister Lind Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  5. Reimer's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1893

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Columbus Finance, Inc. v. HowardOhio Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Beggs v. Universal CIT Credit CorporationSupreme Court of Missouri · 1966
  3. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. SwiftSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  4. Strand v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1943
  5. Skeels v. Universal CIT Credit CorporationDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1963

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API