Legal Opinion

State v. Hammond

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided August 1, 2001No. 00-401PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Defendant appeals from a decision of the district court finding him in violation of his conditions of probation. He argues on appeal that he was not given sufficient notice of the condition he was found to have violated and that the record does not support a finding that he violated a condition voluntarily. We reverse.

Defendant was charged with sexual assault in January 1998. He pled guilty and was sentenced to eight years in prison, with all but three years suspended. Conditions of defendant’s probation included a requirement that he successfully complete the Windsor in-house sex offender…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. BubarSupreme Court of Vermont · 1985
  2. State v. PeckSupreme Court of Vermont · 1988
  3. State v. MosesSupreme Court of Vermont · 1992
  4. Simendinger v. City of BarreSupreme Court of Vermont · 2001
  5. State v. EmerySupreme Court of Vermont · 1991

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. SanvilleSupreme Court of Vermont · 2011
  2. State v. BlaiseSupreme Court of Vermont · 2012
  3. State v. John J. Stern, Jr.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2018
  4. State v. KlunderSupreme Court of Vermont · 2005
  5. State v. Anatoly KishinevskiSupreme Court of Vermont · 2024

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API