State v. Bubar
Supreme Court of Vermont
1Opinion of the CourtAllen, C.J.
This is an appeal from a conviction of sexual assault in violation of 13 V.S.A. § 3252(1)(A). We affirm.
The defendant first contends on appeal that the trial court improperly admitted the complainant’s testimony concerning the effect of the attack on her subsequent mental state, as well as the testimony by the complainant’s counselor about rape trauma syndrome, which describes post-attack symptoms commonly experienced by rape victims. The testimony was offered and accepted by the court as relevant to the ultimate issue of whether the rape had in fact occurred. The defendant contends on appeal…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- United States v. YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- State v. SaldanaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- State v. BaileySupreme Court of Vermont · 1984
- State v. MoranSupreme Court of Vermont · 1982
- State v. MecierSupreme Court of Vermont · 1984
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by71 opinions
- State v. CatsamSupreme Court of Vermont · 1987
- State v. AustinSupreme Court of Vermont · 1996
- State v. PeckSupreme Court of Vermont · 1988
- MacE v. AmestoyDistrict Court, D. Vermont · 1991
- State v. RecorSupreme Court of Vermont · 1988
66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.