State v. Moses
Supreme Court of Vermont
1Opinion of the CourtDooley, J.
Defendant challenges her probationary sentence, which was imposed after a plea of no contest, contending that five special conditions of probation included in the sentence are *296not reasonably related to the crimes committed or are unnecessarily restrictive. Although challenged on similar grounds, each of the five conditions presents a separate inquiry. Two of the challenged conditions are reasonably related to ensuring that defendant avoids future criminal activity; those conditions are affirmed. We hold that the remaining three special conditions are overbroad and unnecessarily restrictive;…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Griffin v. WisconsinSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- People v. BravoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
- Payne v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- United States v. James William GiannettaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
- State v. FieldsHawaii Supreme Court · 1984
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by49 opinions
- State v. AustinSupreme Court of Vermont · 1996
- State v. LockwoodSupreme Court of Vermont · 1993
- State v. Billy Joe PutnamSupreme Court of Vermont · 2015
- State v. RiversSupreme Court of Vermont · 2005
- State v. FreemanSupreme Court of Vermont · 2013
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.