Legal Opinion

State v. Peck

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided April 29, 1988No. 86-561PublishedCited by 61 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPeck, J.

Defendant appeals the district court’s revocation of his probation. We affirm.

The original charge against defendant was a violation of 13 V.S.A. § 2602: committing a lewd and lascivious act upon the body of a child under the age of sixteen. As the result of a plea agreement, however, the State amended the charge to simple assault, 13 V.S.A. § 1023. Defendant entered a plea of nolo contendere to the amended charge and was adjudged guilty. The sentencing judge reviewed a presentence investigation report in which mental health professionals expressed the opinion that defendant was likely to…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Gagnon v. ScarpelliSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. People v. LentCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  3. United States v. John Andrew DaneCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
  4. State v. BubarSupreme Court of Vermont · 1985
  5. State v. ParkerSupreme Court of Vermont · 1988

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by61 opinions

  1. State v. AustinSupreme Court of Vermont · 1996
  2. State v. GleasonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1990
  3. State v. LockwoodSupreme Court of Vermont · 1993
  4. MacE v. AmestoyDistrict Court, D. Vermont · 1991
  5. State v. SanvilleSupreme Court of Vermont · 2011

56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API