Legal Opinion

Simendinger v. City of Barre

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided January 8, 2001No. 98-144PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The City of Barre appeals from a decision of the environmental court granting two conditional use permits to Wesco, Inc. and David Simendinger to convert an existing service-station garage to a convenience store and to alter the four existing gasoline dispensers, from full service to self-service in the first application, and from four to one dispenser in the second application. The City contends the court erroneously: (1) approved the conditional use applications without prior consideration by the City’s zoning board of adjustment; (2) failed to give due consideration to the City’s Master…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. In re Glen M.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1990
  2. Appeal of WeeksSupreme Court of Vermont · 1998
  3. In Re Maple Tree PlaceSupreme Court of Vermont · 1991
  4. Tarrant v. Department of TaxesSupreme Court of Vermont · 1999
  5. In Re Appeals of LetourneauSupreme Court of Vermont · 1998

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. In re Appeal of KorbetSupreme Court of Vermont · 2005
  2. In re Appeal of Wesco, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2006
  3. State v. HammondSupreme Court of Vermont · 2001
  4. Regan v. Pomerleau, DeForest Realty, Inc. and City of BurlingtonSupreme Court of Vermont · 2014
  5. Hathaway v. TuckerSupreme Court of Vermont · 2010

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API