Legal Opinion

Bybee v. Fairchild

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 20, 1946No. Civ. 13041PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPeters, P. J.

Defendants appeal from an order denying their motion for a change of venue.

The action was commenced in San Mateo County against the five named defendants. Demurrers were filed, and at the same time defendants filed notices of motions for a change of venue supported by proper affidavits of merit. The notices and affidavits disclose that all of the defendants at the time of the commencement of the action were residents of Lassen County. This is not disputed. It is contended that the complaint joins a local and transitory cause of action, namely, a purported action to quiet title to real…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Smith v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Fong v. SternesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Coley v. HeckerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Neet v. HolmesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Lyons v. Brunswick-Balke-Collender Co.California Supreme Court · 1942

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Peiser v. MettlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Jarvis v. HamiltonIdaho Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Rench v. HarrisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
  4. Gilman v. NordinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  5. Haurat v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API