Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Haurat v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 4, 1966No. Civ. 30202PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FRAMPTON, J. pro tem. *

Petitioner seeks a writ of mandate to compel the superior court to vacate and set aside its order denying, and to grant his motion for, a change of venue from Los Angeles County to the City and County of San Francisco.

The real party in interest filed his complaint in Los Angeles County. Petitioner, defendant, filed his answer and notice of motion, supported by Ms affidavit, for a change of venue on the sole ground that he resided in the City and County of San Francisco. The real party filed opposition to the motion and notice of countermotion for an order to retain the…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Freedman v. Rector, Wardens & Vestrymen of St. Matthias ParishCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Crogan v. MetzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Steiner v. RowleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Haigler v. DonnellyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Kaluzok v. BrissonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Brown v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Fischer v. MacHadoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
  3. Gutierrez v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
  4. San Francisco Foundation v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Ebeling v. Continental Illinois Natl. Bank & Trust Co. of ChicagoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API