Legal Opinion
McAfee v. Cole
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Decided February 18, 1994PublishedCited by 46 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RUDMAN, Justice.
Mark A. McAfee appeals from the judgment entered in the Superior Court (Cumberland County, Lipez, J.) dismissing his complaint against defendants Warren S. Cole (“Cole”) and Cole Farms Restaurant, Inc. (“Cole Farms”), pursuant to M.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6). McAfee raises three arguments on appeal: (1) because his claims based on sexual abuse did not accrue until he “discovered” them in 1992, they are not barred by the statute of limitations; (2) even if his claims would otherwise be barred by the statute of limitations, factual issues concerning the tolling provisions of 14 M.R.S.A.…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Johnson v. BollingerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
- Johnson v. BollingerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
- Larrabee v. Penobscot Frozen Foods, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1984
- Cyr v. CyrSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1981
- Jeanne Allyn Smith v. Franklin Karl SmithCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by46 opinions
- Doe v. RoeArizona Supreme Court · 1998
- Bryan R. v. Watchtower Bible & Tract Society of New York, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1999
- Stickney v. City of SacoSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2001
- In Re Wage Payment LitigationSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2000
- Musk v. NelsonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1994
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.