Legal Opinion

Corporation Commission v. Union Oil Co. of California

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 27, 1979No. 50668PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HARGRAVE, Justice:

Union Oil Company of California and Amoco Production Company appeal from Corporation Commission Order No. 128054 as corrected by Order No. 128263, wherein Herman George Kaiser, the appellee, was authorized to drill a well in the center of SW/4 of the SW/4 of Section 2, ION, 9W, in Caddo County, Oklahoma, as an additional well to test the Morrow and Springer formation. The order fixes a penalty of 50% for the additional well and sets an allowable for the amended unit based on the greater open-flow potential of either the previously drilled on-pattern well or the anticipated…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Cameron v. Corporation CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1966
  2. Peppers Refining Co. v. Corporation CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1947
  3. Wood Oil Co. v. Corporation CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1950
  4. H. F. Wilcox Oil & Gas Co. v. WalkerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
  5. Layton v. Pan American Petroleum CorporationSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1963

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Forest Oil Corp. v. Corporation Com'n of OklahomaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1991
  2. Sarah M. Spaeth v. Union Oil Company of California, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1983
  3. Cline v. Oklahoma Coalition for Reproductive JusticeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2013
  4. TOCH, LLC v. CITY OF TULSASupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2020
  5. Marathon Oil Co. v. Corporation CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API