Legal Opinion
Russell v. Walker
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided October 11, 1932No. 24059PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtAndrews, J.
This cause is before this court on a petition and relation for prohibition filed by the petitioners, Frank Russell, individually, and Frank Russell, as trustee, and an answer or response thereto filed by the respondents Paul Walker, Roy Hughes and O. C. Childers, members of and composing the Corporation Commission of the state of Oklahoma, and E. G. Dahlgren, a complainant before the Corporation Commission.
In the petition and relation it is alleged that the petitioners have special interests and property rights in and to two certain described tracts of land, uporu each of which there is a…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Lindsley v. Natural Carbonic Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
- New State Ice Co. v. LiebmannSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Ohio Oil Company v. IndianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Oklahoma Operating Co. v. LoveSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Walls v. Midland Carbon Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1920
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Patterson v. Stanolind Oil & Gas Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
- State Ex Rel. Blankenship v. FreemanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1968
- Sterling Refining Co. v. WalkerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
- Anderson-Prichard Oil Corp. v. Corporation CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1951
- Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. v. Oklahoma Corporation CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.