Bechtel v. Axelrod
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtCurtis, J.
Having foreclosed a deed of trust given as security for a promissory note, the plaintiff commenced this action against the defendants Axelrod and Rosenthal to obtain a deficiency judgment. The defendant Axelrod had executed the note as an accommodation maker for the benefit of the defendant Rosenthal. The wife of the defendant Axelrod intervened seeking a declaration that their community property could not be subjected to payment of the obligation since it had been incurred by her husband solely as an accommodation maker and without her knowledge and consent. The trial court found that no…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Elliott v. Superior Court of Cal.California Supreme Court · 1914
- Isaacs v. JonesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Coffey v. GreenfieldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
- Jersey Maid Milk Products Co. v. BrockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
- La Mesa Lemon Grove & Spring Valley Irrigation District v. HalleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Farmers Mutuals Automobile Insurance v. WeberSupreme Court of Missouri · 1954
- Timberidge Enterprises, Inc. v. City of Santa RosaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
- Allen v. California Water & Telephone Co.California Supreme Court · 1947
- Associated Boat Industries v. MarshallCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
- Corridan v. RoseCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.