Legal Opinion
Kerotest Mfg. Co. v. C-O-Two Fire Equipment Co.
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided August 18, 1950No. Civ. A. No. 1300PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RODNEY, District Judge..This case comes before the court upon two contemporaneous motions: (1) a mor tipn of the plaintiff, .Kerotest, for a preliminary injunction restraining the defendant, C-O-Two, from proceeding against Kero-test in a civil action in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, which action will hereafter, for reasons of brevity, be called the Chicago action; and (2) a motion of. C-O-Two praying for an order staying further proceedings in the present action until ten days after final determination of the Chicago action.
The pertinent facts are…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Crosley Corporation v. Hazeltine CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1941
- Crosley Corp. v. Westinghouse Electric & Manufacturing Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1942
- Earle v. Illinois Central RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Continental Illinois National Bank & Trust Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Davis v. L. L. Cohen & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1925
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Kerotest Manufacturing Co. v. C-O-Two Fire Equipment Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Kerotest Mfg. Co. v. C-O-Two Fire Equipment Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1951
- Wagner v. New York, Ontario and Western RailwayDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1956
- Messelt v. Security Storage Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1953
- Hamilton Watch Co. v. Read Drug & Chemical Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 1964
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.