Legal Opinion
Crosley Corporation v. Hazeltine Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided September 11, 1941No. 7725PublishedCited by 232 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MARIS, Circuit Judge.
Hazeltine Corporation is a Delaware corporation which holds title to some 400 patents in the radio and television field and, through a subsidiary, maintains laboratories in which it conducts research in these fields. The Crosley Corporation is an Ohio corporation with its principal place of manufacture in Cincinnati. In June, 1939, Crosley terminated a twelve years’ license agreement with Hazeltine and refused to renew it. In December, 1939, Hazeltine formally notified Crosley that the latter was infringing 22 patents owned by Hazeltine. In May, 1940, Hazel-tine sued…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Kline v. Burke Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Princess Lida of Thurn and Taxis v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Matthews v. RodgersSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Penn Central Casualty Co. v. Pennsylvania Ex Rel. SchnaderSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Oklahoma Packing Co. v. Oklahoma Gas & Electric Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by232 opinions
- University of Pennsylvania v. Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Semmes Motors, Inc., Suing on Behalf of Itself and Together With Ford Dealers Alliance, Inc., Etc. v. Ford Motor CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1970
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. University of Pennsylvania. Appeal of the Trustees of the University of PennsylvaniaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988
- Lawrence Roth v. Bank of the CommonwealthCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1978
- Compagnie Des Bauxites De Guinea v. Insurance Company of North AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981
227 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.