Legal Opinion
Hamilton Watch Co. v. Read Drug & Chemical Co.
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided April 14, 1964No. Civ. A. No. 14586PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
■ R. DORSEY WATKINS, District Judge.
The Read Drug and Chemical Company (Read’s), sued by Hamilton Watch Company (Hamilton) for alleged infringement of Hamilton’s patents by the salé of “Timex” electrically driven wrist watches, has moved for a stay of this action pending the trial of a declaratory judgment suit in the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut, C.A. No. 9794, entitled “United States Time Corporation v. The Hamilton Watch Company, Inc.”, in which Hamilton is defendant and the plaintiff (U. S. Time) is the importer and distributor of Timex watches.
From the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Kerotest Manufacturing Co. v. C-O-Two Fire Equipment Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Kessler v. EldredSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
- Kerotest Mfg. Co. v. C-O-Two Fire Equipment Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1951
- International Nickel Co., Inc. v. Martin J. Barry, IncCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1953
- Joseph Bancroft & Sons Co. v. Spunize Co. Of America, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1959
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- General Tire & Rubber Co. v. Isocyanate Products, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1967
- Emerson Electric Co. v. Black & Decker Manufacturing Co.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 1978