Legal Opinion
Messelt v. Security Storage Co.
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided July 27, 1953No. Civ. A. No. 1170PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RODNEY, District Judge.
The difficulties of this case are presented by a motion to dismiss the third cause of action, as amended. Some facts of the case are set out in a former opinion,1 but an understanding of the present questions can only be had by a repetition of some factual background.
The plaintiffs, in April, 1945, intending to move to Nevada employed the defendant, Security Storage, to remove their household goods to Security Storage quarters and, upon notification, to ship the goods to their new home at Minden, Nevada. Pursuant to this instruction the employees of one of the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Kerotest Manufacturing Co. v. C-O-Two Fire Equipment Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Mullaney v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Hartmann v. Time, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1948
- Kerotest Mfg. Co. v. C-O-Two Fire Equipment Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1951
- United States v. City of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1948
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Adolph G. Hoffman v. C. H. Halden, Dr. Donald E. Wair, Dr. G. F. Keller and Dr. F. Sydney HansenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1959
- Braud v. Transport Service Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2006
- Martz v. Miller Brothers CompanyDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1965
- Smith v. Piper Aircraft Corp.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1955
- Oliefabrik v. A. O. Smith Corp.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1958
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.