Legal Opinion
In Re Sheridan
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided April 18, 2002No. 00-BG-46PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RUIZ, Associate Judge:
This reciprocal discipline matter was initiated by the Office of Bar Counsel for the District of Columbia (“Bar Counsel”), which informed this court in accordance with District of Columbia Bar Rule XI, § 11(b) that the Maryland Court of Appeals had indefinitely suspended respondent Robert J. Sheridan from the practice of law in Maryland. In an order dated February 4, 2000, we temporarily suspended respondent from practicing law in the District of Columbia pursuant to District of Columbia Bar Rule XI, § 11(d) and directed the Board on Professional Responsibility (“Board”)…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Matter of AddamsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
- In Re ZilberbergDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. GlennCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1996
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. SheridanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1999
- Matter of ShorterDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- In Re GallagherDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2005
- In re Barry J. NaceDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2014
- In Re ZakroffDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007
- In re MirskyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2004
- In Re Mba-JonasDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2010
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.