Legal Opinion

Odle v. Thompson

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided June 6, 2001No. 96C-13941; A100442PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrewer, J.

Plaintiff appealed from a judgment dismissing his petition for a writ of habeas corpus, in which he alleged that he was entitled to release on parole. While the appeal was pending, plaintiff was released from prison and was placed on active parole supervision. Defendant has moved to dismiss the appeal, arguing that plaintiffs release has rendered his petition moot. Plaintiff replies that he is currently subject to active, rather than inactive, supervision as a result of his unlawful confinement after April 1997, when, he asserts, he was entitled to release. He contends that more onerous…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hanson v. EstellCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2000
  2. Barnes v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
  3. Baty v. SlaterCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
  4. Baty v. SlaterCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
  5. Perdue v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison SupervisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Marc A. Burnett v. Robert O. Lampert Oregon Board of Parole and Post Prison SupervisionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
  2. Green v. BaldwinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
  3. Dunmire v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison SupervisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
  4. Burnett v. LampertCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API