Legal Opinion

Barnes v. Thompson

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided March 31, 1999No. 97C-10037; CA A100361PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*385LANDAU, J.

Plaintiff petitioned for habeas corpus relief, alleging that the Board of Parole’s (Board) extension of his projected parole release date for two years violated the ex post facto provisions of the state and federal constitutions. He sought release from prison. The trial court ruled against plaintiff and dismissed the writ. Plaintiff appealed the trial court’s decision. During the pendency of the appeal, plaintiff was paroled from prison.

The state argues that the appeal has been mooted by plaintiffs release. Plaintiff responds that the case is not moot because collateral consequences…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Brumnett v. Psychiatric Security Review BoardOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Barcik v. KubiaczykOregon Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Pham v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Marc A. Burnett v. Robert O. Lampert Oregon Board of Parole and Post Prison SupervisionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
  2. Utsey v. Coos CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
  3. Baty v. SlaterCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
  4. State v. HauskinsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
  5. State v. StroudCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2018

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API