Legal Opinion
Hanson v. Estell
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided April 13, 2000No. 17143-4-IIIPublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
997 P.2d 426 (2000)
100 Wash.App. 281
Milton HANSON and Roberta Hanson, husband and wife, Respondents,
v.
Karen ESTELL and Daniel Estell, wife and husband, Appellants,
Spokane County Sheriff's Department, Sheriff John Goldman and Jane Doe Goldman, husband and wife, Deputy Sheriff D.B. Henderson and Jane Doe Henderson, husband and wife, and Deputy John Doe Mulvey and Jane Doe Mulvey, husband and wife, Defendants.
No. 17143-4-III.
Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 3, Panel Three.
April 13, 2000.
Frank C. King, Spokane, for Appellants.
Milton A. Hanson, Roberta K. Hanson, Otis Orchards, for…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Holland v. Boeing CompanyWashington Supreme Court · 1978
- Hanson v. City of SnohomishWashington Supreme Court · 1993
- Peasley v. Puget Sound Tug & Barge Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1942
- Ferree v. Doric Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1963
- Price v. Kitsap TransitWashington Supreme Court · 1994
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Clark v. BainesWashington Supreme Court · 2004
- Clark v. BainesWashington Supreme Court · 2004
- Loeffelholz v. Citizens for Leaders With Ethics & Accountability NowCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004
- Proctor v. HuntingtonWashington Supreme Court · 2010
- Proctor v. HuntingtonWashington Supreme Court · 2010
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.