Legal Opinion

Dunmire v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided May 7, 2014No. A151358PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHaselton, C. J.

Petitioner seeks judicial review of an order of the Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision (the board), contending that, following the revocation of his parole, the board lacked authority under the applicable statutes and rules to incarcerate him for 30 months and that, although we have case law to the contrary, see, e.g., State ex rel Gonzalez v. Washington, 182 Or App 112, 47 P3d 537 (2002), “all of the premises upon which it stands are demonstrably inaccurate.” We need not resolve the merits of petitioner’s contention because, as we will explain, this judicial review proceeding is…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Barnes v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
  2. Haskins v. PalmateerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
  3. STATE EX REL. GONZALEZ v. WashingtonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
  4. Odle v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
  5. Green v. BaldwinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Miller v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison SupervisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
  2. Atkinson v. Board of ParoleCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API