Legal Opinion

Sundance Mechanical & Utility Corp. v. Atlas

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided August 9, 1994No. 21159PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BACA, Justice.

Plaintiff-Appellant, Sundance Mechanical & Utility Corporation (“Sundance”), appeals from the district court’s decision concluding that Defendants-Appellees, Marvin and Carole Atlas (the “Atlases”), were entitled to the benefit of NMSA 1978, Section 48-2-10.1(A) (Repl.Pamp.1987) (mandating the conditions for discharge of a materialman’s lien). On appeal we decide whether the district court erred when it determined that the Atlases were entitled to the benefit of Section 48-2-10.1(A). We review this case under SCRA 1986, 12-102(A)(1) (Repl.Pamp.1992), and reverse.

I

This…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Silva v. StateNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Shovelin v. Central New Mexico Electric Cooperative, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Hydro Conduit Corp. v. KembleNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1990
  4. United States ex rel. Sunworks Division of Sun Collector Corp. v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1982
  5. Terry v. PipkinNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1959

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Ontiveros Insulation Co., Inc. v. SanchezNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2000
  2. Reisenfeld & Co. v. The Network Group, Inc. Builders Square, Inc. K Mart Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
  3. Ideal v. Burlington Resources Oil & Gas Co. LPNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2010
  4. Rex, Inc. v. Manufactured Hous. Comm. of NMNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Abraham v. WPX Energy Production, LLCDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2014

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API