Sundance Mechanical & Utility Corp. v. Atlas
New Mexico Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BACA, Justice.
Plaintiff-Appellant, Sundance Mechanical & Utility Corporation (“Sundance”), appeals from the district court’s decision concluding that Defendants-Appellees, Marvin and Carole Atlas (the “Atlases”), were entitled to the benefit of NMSA 1978, Section 48-2-10.1(A) (Repl.Pamp.1987) (mandating the conditions for discharge of a materialman’s lien). On appeal we decide whether the district court erred when it determined that the Atlases were entitled to the benefit of Section 48-2-10.1(A). We review this case under SCRA 1986, 12-102(A)(1) (Repl.Pamp.1992), and reverse.
I
This…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Silva v. StateNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1987
- Shovelin v. Central New Mexico Electric Cooperative, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1993
- Hydro Conduit Corp. v. KembleNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1990
- United States ex rel. Sunworks Division of Sun Collector Corp. v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1982
- Terry v. PipkinNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1959
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Ontiveros Insulation Co., Inc. v. SanchezNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2000
- Reisenfeld & Co. v. The Network Group, Inc. Builders Square, Inc. K Mart Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
- Ideal v. Burlington Resources Oil & Gas Co. LPNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2010
- Rex, Inc. v. Manufactured Hous. Comm. of NMNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1995
- Abraham v. WPX Energy Production, LLCDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2014
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.