Legal Opinion
Ideal v. Burlington Resources Oil & Gas Co. LP
New Mexico Supreme Court
Decided April 27, 2010No. 31,491PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CHÁVEZ, Justice.
{1} Plaintiffs-Respondents (Plaintiffs) are royalty owners who brought a class action lawsuit claiming that Defendant-Petitioner (Burlington) has underpaid royalties by improperly deducting the costs and expenses associated with placing natural gas in a marketable condition. The district court certified a class under Rule 1-023(B)(2) and (B)(3) NMRA, finding that “[t]he common pre-tailgate deduction issues and the ‘marketable conditions rule’ continue to dominate the overall case.” We granted this interlocutory appeal to review the district court’s certification of the…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Taylor v. SturgellSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Phillips Petroleum Co. v. ShuttsSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Richards v. Jefferson CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Sims v. SimsNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1996
- Mark V, Inc. v. MellekasNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1993
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Guttman v. KhalsaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2012
- Ysasi v. BrownDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2014
- CONSUMER DATA INDUSTRY ASS'N v. KingCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2012
- Anderson Living Trust v. WPX Energy Production, LLCDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2015
- Anderson Living Trust v. Energen Res. Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2018
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.