Legal Opinion

Terry v. Pipkin

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided June 11, 1959No. 6547PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MOISE, Justice.

This case involves the question of whether or not a judgment entered in an action on account due for goods, wares and merchandise sold by plaintiff to defendant is res judicata in a subsequent action in quantum meruit or in an action for restitution between the same parties for the same goods, wares and merchandise.

The facts are these: Plaintiff (appellant) is in the business of installing pumps. Defendant (appellee) had a pump on his property in Curry County, New Mexico, which was not functioning properly. Plaintiff pulled the pump, made certain repairs thereto and replaced it…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Paulos v. JanetakosNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1942
  2. State Ex Rel. Sofeico v. HeffernanNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Town of Atrisco v. MonohanNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Zawada v. Pennsylvania System Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
  5. Biaett v. Phoenix Title & Trust Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1950

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Hydro Conduit Corp. v. KembleNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Buhler v. MarrujoNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1974
  3. Morris Ex Rel. Morris v. FitzgeraldNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1963
  4. City of Santa Fe v. VelardeNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1977
  5. United States ex rel. Sunworks Division of Sun Collector Corp. v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1982

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API