Legal Opinion
Rex, Inc. v. Manufactured Hous. Comm. of NM
New Mexico Supreme Court
Decided March 14, 1995No. 21831PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FROST, Justice.
Petitioner-Appellant Rex, Inc., (Rex) appeals from an order by Resp ondent-App ellee Manufactured Housing Committee (MHC) requiring that it repay, in full, a down payment made by Dimples Atkins (Atkins) on a mobile home. Rex argues that the MHC was collaterally estopped from ordering repayment because Atkins and Rex had already settled their claims by arbitration. Rex also contends that the MHC improperly allowed Rex only one peremptory challenge at the disciplinary hearing. We reverse in part and remand.
I. FACTS
On August 20, 1991, Atkins entered into a contract to…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Alexander v. Gardner-Denver Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Gilmer v. Interstate/Johnson Lane Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Barrentine v. Arkansas-Best Freight System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
- General Telephone Co. of the Northwest, Inc. v. Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Rio Grande Chapter of the Sierra Club v. New Mexico Mining CommissionNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2002
- Durham v. GuestNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2009
- Cody Farms, Inc. v. Deerman (In re Deerman)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Mexico · 2012
- Board of Education for the Carlsbad Municipal Schools v. New Mexico State Department of Public EducationNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1999
- City of Reno v. Reno Police Protective Ass'nNevada Supreme Court · 2002
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.