Legal Opinion

Hydro Conduit Corp. v. Kemble

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided June 19, 1990No. 18446PublishedCited by 61 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MONTGOMERY, Justice.

The issue in this case is whether sovereign immunity bars a claim against the state for unjust enrichment. The trial court held that it does and granted the state’s motion to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief could be granted. We hold that the trial court was correct and affirm: A claim for unjust enrichment is an action “based on contract” within the grant of immunity to governmental entities under NMSA 1978, Section 37-1-23.

I

During 1984, the State of New Mexico, through the Office of Military Affairs/Civil Emergency Preparedness…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Paschall's, Inc. v. DozierTennessee Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Hicks v. StateNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Methola v. County of EddyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Mass Transit Administration v. Granite Construction Co.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1984
  5. Albuquerque National Bank v. Albuquerque Ranch Estates, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1982

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by61 opinions

  1. Robinson v. Colorado State Lottery DivisionSupreme Court of Colorado · 2008
  2. Hartbarger v. Frank Paxton Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Garcia v. Middle Rio Grande Conservancy DistrictNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Handmaker v. HenneyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Ontiveros Insulation Co., Inc. v. SanchezNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2000

56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API