Hydro Conduit Corp. v. Kemble
New Mexico Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MONTGOMERY, Justice.
The issue in this case is whether sovereign immunity bars a claim against the state for unjust enrichment. The trial court held that it does and granted the state’s motion to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief could be granted. We hold that the trial court was correct and affirm: A claim for unjust enrichment is an action “based on contract” within the grant of immunity to governmental entities under NMSA 1978, Section 37-1-23.
I
During 1984, the State of New Mexico, through the Office of Military Affairs/Civil Emergency Preparedness…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Paschall's, Inc. v. DozierTennessee Supreme Court · 1966
- Hicks v. StateNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1976
- Methola v. County of EddyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1980
- Mass Transit Administration v. Granite Construction Co.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1984
- Albuquerque National Bank v. Albuquerque Ranch Estates, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1982
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by61 opinions
- Robinson v. Colorado State Lottery DivisionSupreme Court of Colorado · 2008
- Hartbarger v. Frank Paxton Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1993
- Garcia v. Middle Rio Grande Conservancy DistrictNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1996
- Handmaker v. HenneyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1999
- Ontiveros Insulation Co., Inc. v. SanchezNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2000
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.