Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Dayton Walther Corp. v. Industrial Commission

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 7, 1994No. 93-1698PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

Walther argues that the commission abused its discretion in: (1) rehearing claimant’s application, (2) basing its decision on rehearing on the reports of the doctors specified, and (3) relying in part on nonallowed conditions in issuing its finding. Upon review, we find Walther’s arguments to be unpersuasive and affirm the judgment below.

After finding that the commission’s first permanent total disability order violated Noll, supra, the appellate court vacated the order and directed the commission “to enter an order which complies with Noll * * *.” Because the entry did not expressly instruct…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Waddle v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1993
  2. State ex rel. Zamora v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1989
  3. State ex rel. Ormet Corp. v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  4. State ex rel. Rodriguez v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1993
  5. State ex rel. Fields v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1993

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Sigler v. Lubrizol Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 2013
  2. State ex rel. Knedler v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API