Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Fields v. Industrial Commission

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 16, 1993No. 92-2076PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Per curiam

State ex rel. Noll v. Indus. Comm. (1991), 57 Ohio St.3d 203, 567 N.E.2d 245, directed the commission to “specifically state what evidence has been relied upon, and briefly explain the reasoning for its decision. An order of the commission should make it readily apparent from the four corners of the decision that there is some evidence supporting it.” Id. at 206, 567 N.E.2d at 248.

The commission concedes that its order does not satisfy Noll since it does not explain the reasoning behind the order but merely identifies evidence that the commission deemed relevant. Mere recitation of claimant’s…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Noll v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1991
  2. State ex rel. Stephenson v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1987
  3. State ex rel. Lampkins v. Dayton Malleable, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1989
  4. State ex rel. Wilcox v. Ashtabula County Highway DepartmentOhio Supreme Court · 1992

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Waddle v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1993
  2. State ex rel. Nicholson v. Copperweld Steel Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1996
  3. State ex rel. Yancey v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1997
  4. State ex rel. Reliance Electric Co. v. WrightOhio Supreme Court · 2001
  5. State ex rel. Erico Products, Inc. v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1994

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API