State ex rel. Ormet Corp. v. Industrial Commission
Ohio Supreme Court
1Per curiam
Although Commissioner Smith did not attend claimant’s permanent total disability hearing or review any transcript or summary of the proceedings, he nonetheless voted on claimant’s application for permanent total disability benefits. We must determine whether his participation violated due process. For the reasons to follow, we find that it did.
The parties concentrate on Morgan v. United States (1936), 298 U.S. 468, which arose from a Department of Agriculture (“USDA”) inquiry under the Packers and Stockyards Act (“Act”) into market agencies’ rates for buying and selling livestock. In that…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- United States v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Morgan v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Ohio Bell Telephone Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Morgan v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- City of Cedar Rapids v. Municipal Fire & Police Retirement System of IowaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1995
- TBC Westlake, Inc. v. Hamilton County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 1998
- State ex rel. Blake v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1992
- Gross v. State Med. Bd. of Ohio, 08ap-437 (12-23-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008
- State Ex Rel. Matlack, Inc. v. Industrial CommissionOhio Court of Appeals · 1991
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.