Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Zamora v. Industrial Commission

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided August 16, 1989No. 87-993PublishedCited by 48 opinions

1Per curiam

The commission based its denial of permanent total disability compensation particularly on the reports of Dr. Brown and Dr. Kogut. The court of appeals rejected Dr. Brown’s report as “some evi*19dence” to support the commission’s decision because it did not evaluate the combined effect of Zamora’s physical and psychiatric conditions, as required by State, ex rel. Anderson, v. Indus. Comm., supra. It rejected Dr. Kogut’s report for the same reason and because “* * * his opinion was, at least in part, rejected when the psychiatric condition was recognized by the Industrial Commission.” Before this…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Burley v. Coil Packing, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1987
  2. State ex rel. Lampkins v. Dayton Malleable, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1989

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Domjancic v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  2. State ex rel. Kroger Co. v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  3. State ex rel. Baker Material Handling Corp. v. Indus.Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1994
  4. State ex rel. Domjancic v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1994
  5. State ex rel. Varney v. Indus. Comm. (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2014

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API