Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Waddle v. Industrial Commission

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided October 13, 1993No. 92-2081PublishedCited by 115 opinions

1Per curiam

The parties debate the role nonallowed conditions should play in a permanent total disability determination. Amici Ohio AFL-CIO et al. (“AFL-CIO”) contend that nonallowed conditions are Stephenson factors that must be considered in this determination. The other parties disagree — including claimant, whose interest amici AFL-CIO purport to further. Baker and amici Ohio Manufacturer’s Association et al. (“OMA”) do not focus on nonallowed conditions generally, but only on those that prevent sustained remunerative employment. Where such conditions exist, Baker and amici argue that a finding of…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Noll v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1991
  2. State ex rel. Ashcraft v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1987
  3. State ex rel. Rockwell International v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  4. State Ex Rel. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp. v. Industrial CommissionOhio Court of Appeals · 1985
  5. State ex rel. Diversitech General Plastic Film Division v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1989

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by115 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Gay v. MihmOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  2. State ex rel. Jackson v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  3. State ex rel. B.F. Goodrich Co. v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  4. State ex rel. Bradley v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  5. State ex rel. Shields v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1996

110 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API