Legal Opinion
Poynter v. Beacon Falls Rubber Co.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided September 29, 1925No. 15757PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
THREADGILL, C.
On January 27, 1923, defendant in error, as plaintiff, commenced this action in the county court against the plaintiff in error, as defendant to recover on account for merchandise. An itemized, verified account was attached to the petition, showing items of merchandise sold and delivered to defendant from January 31, 1920, to May 9, 1920, in the sum of $811.22, and items of credits from November 20, 1920, to October 13, 1921, in the sum of $629.15, leaving a balance due and unpaid of $182.07, for which it prays judgment. On September S, 1923, defendant filed his answer…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Hogan v. BaileySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
- Vickers v. Philip Carey Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- City of Sapulpa v. DeasonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
- Midland Valley R. Co. v. GobleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
- Burns v. VaughtSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Bishop's Restaurants, Inc. of Tulsa v. WhombleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1960
- M.-K.-T. R. Co. v. EmbreySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
- McMahan v. McCaffertySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952
- Russell v. MargoSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
- State Ex Rel. Shull v. MooreSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.