Legal Opinion

Burns v. Vaught

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided January 10, 1911No. 637PublishedCited by 20 opinions

Error from District Court, Stephens County; Frank M. Bailey, Judge. Action by Robert Burns, as receiver of the Bank of Comanche against G. W. Vaught. Judgment for defendant, and plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtKane, J.

The issues in this cause in the court below were substantially as follows: Robert Burns, as receiver of the Bank of Comanche, commenced an action against defendant G. W. Vaught to recover certain sums of money as follows: $4,000, evidenced by a certain promissory note, with interest thereon at the rate of 8 per cent, from date of said note; $272.50, evidenced by a certain promissory note, with interest thereon at the rate of S per cent, from the date of said note; and the sum of $1,103.09, an overdraft alleged to be due said Bank of Comanche at the time of its liquidation. The defendant…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Twine v. KilgoreSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1895

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Dodson Williams v. ParsonsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
  2. Love v. Kirkbride Drilling & Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  3. Jones v. Oklahoma Planing Mill & Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  4. Hilsmeyer v. BlakeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  5. Eskridge v. TaylorSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API