Midland Valley R. Co. v. Goble
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from District Court, Kay County; W. M. Bowles, Judge. Action by M. T. Goble against Midland Valley Railroad Company. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error. Defendant also brings error from action of court in denying petition for new trial on ground of newly discovered evidence. Actions consolidated.
1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, J.
This action was commenced by M. T. Goble, the defendant in error, in the district court of Kay county, Oklahoma, to recover $30,000 damages for personal injuries alleged to have been sustained by him while in the employ of the defendant by reason of the negligence of the defendant.
For convenience, the parties will hereinafter be referred to as “plaintiff” and “defendant,” respectively, as they appeared in the trial court.
The essential allegations of the plaintiff’s petition were as follows:
“That heretofore, to-wit: on the 8th day of February, 1917, at about the hour of 8.30 p. m., the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Vickers v. Philip Carey Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Roth v. Union Nat. Bank of BartlesvilleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- Wingate v. RenderSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- Phoenix Printing Co. v. DurhamSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. NagleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- M.-K.-T. R. Co. v. EmbreySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
- Fry v. WolfeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
- Holmes v. ChadwellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
- Lamb v. AlexanderSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
- City of Cushing v. PoteSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.