Legal Opinion
State Ex Rel. Shull v. Moore
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided December 19, 1933No. 23329PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBusby, J.
The principal question involved in this appeal is whether the finding of the trial court that a quitclaim deed was not given as a mortgage to secure the payment of certain indebtedness is against the clear weight of the evidence.
This action was commenced in the district court of Nowata county on January 2, 1930. The plaintiff, State of Oklahoma ex rel. 0. Graves Shull, Bank Commissioner, sought to recover on behalf of the Sapulpa State Bank (a failed state bank in the process of liquidation) a money judgment against H. H. Moore, and to foreclose an alleged real estate mortgage lien claimed by…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Hibernian Banking Ass'n v. DavisIllinois Supreme Court · 1920
- Standard Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Anthony Wholesale Grocery Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- Moorman v. PettitSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
- Nero v. BrooksSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
- Poynter v. Beacon Falls Rubber Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Richard v. RichardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- Barber v. FlynnSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980
- Winters v. BirchSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
- Oklahoma City v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
- City of Seminole v. FieldsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.