Legal Opinion
Matter of Electronic Surveillance
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided November 1, 1984No. Misc. 84-819PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
RALPH M. FREEMAN, Senior District Judge.
This matter is before the court on the motion of the Grievance Administrator of the Michigan Attorney Grievance Commission for disclosure, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 2517, of information gleaned from Title III electronic surveillance which allegedly incriminates certain members of the State Bar of Michigan. Although no federal or state criminal charges are pending against the attorneys involved, the Grievance Administrator believes that the information sought may lead to State Bar disciplinary proceedings against the attorneys. Neither…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- United States v. Procter & Gamble Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Iannelli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- In Re RuffaloSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Douglas Oil Co. of Cal. v. Petrol Stops NorthwestSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- United States v. GiordanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- In Re Grand Jury 89Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991
- Matter of Grand Jury Investigation (90-3-2)District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1990
- In Re Electronic Surveillance. Robert E. Berg v. Michigan Attorney Grievance Commission United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1995
- Doe v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991
- Disclosure of Grand Jury Matters to the President and Other Officials, Department of Justice Office of Legal Counsel1993
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.