Legal Opinion

In Re Electronic Surveillance. Robert E. Berg v. Michigan Attorney Grievance Commission United States of America

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided March 23, 1995No. 93-2615PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

AMENDED OPINION

SUHRHEINRICH, Circuit Judge.

Petitioner-Appellant Robert E. Berg (“petitioner”) appeals from the district court’s order granting the government’s motion to unseal Title III recordings. In the meantime, the lower court has also ordered that its disclosure ruling be stayed pending the outcome of this appeal. The issue presented is whether a federal investigative officer may turn over wiretaps from a federal investigation to a state attorney grievance commission that is investigating potential misconduct by one of its licensed attorneys. We conclude that it may, and AFFIRM.

I

As part…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. In Re Leon JenkinsMichigan Supreme Court · 1991
  2. In Re Grand Jury 89Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991
  3. Charles J. Resha (84-5012), Jack Dickens (84-5015), Homer Lee Scott (84-5016) v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1985
  4. Scott v. United StatesDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1983
  5. Matter of Electronic SurveillanceDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1984

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. United States v. BlagojevichDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2009
  2. In re the United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2006
  3. United States v. BlagojevichDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2009
  4. In Re Intercepted Comms. to US Senate SelectDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2009
  5. In Re of US for an Order Author. Inter. of WireDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2006

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API