Legal Opinion

Doe v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided April 26, 1991No. 90-2219PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOYCE F. MARTIN, Jr., Circuit Judge.

This matter comes before the court on a motion to stay an order granting disclosure of grand jury material gathered in the investigation of a state judge alleged to have engaged in inappropriate dealings with attorneys who practice before him. The sole issue on appeal is whether the district court properly granted the Michigan Attorney Grievance Commission’s request for disclosure of all evidence presented to the grand jury that might relate to possible criminal or unethical conduct by a Michigan attorney who, for lack of a better term, we shall refer to as…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Salve Regina College v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. Branzburg v. HayesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. United States v. Procter & Gamble Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1958
  5. Douglas Oil Co. of Cal. v. Petrol Stops NorthwestSupreme Court of the United States · 1979

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Andersons, Inc. v. Horton Farms, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
  2. In Re Grand Jury 89Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991
  3. BIEDA v. CNH INDUSTRIAL AMERICA LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API