Legal Opinion
Brickell v. Wittmar
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 10, 1959No. Civ. 9677PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WARNE, J. pro tem. *
In this action both of the plaintiffs appeal from a judgment entered against them upon a defense verdict in a personal injury action, but upon request of counsel for appellants the appeal has been dismissed as to the plaintiff-appellant Percy Ball, as business representative of Construction and General Laborers Union Local Number 185.
Since an order denying a new trial in such as the instant case is not appealable, the appeal from said order is dismissed. (Code Civ. Proc., § 963.)
The sole contention on this appeal is that a new trial should have been granted because of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- DeWITT v. GlazierCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
- Mast v. ClaxtonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
- People v. WebbCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
- Dunford v. General Water Heater Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1957
- Schultz v. SussmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Weathers v. Kaiser Foundation HospitalsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Bardessono v. MichelsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- State of Cal. Ex Rel. Dept. of Water Resources v. Natomas Co.California Court of Appeal · 1966
- People Ex Rel. Department of Public Works v. HuntCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
- Kraus v. Walt Disney Productions, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1963