Kraus v. Walt Disney Productions, Inc.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtKingsley, J.
Access to the production lot of defendant studio is by means of a gate or turnstile. This turnstile resembles the ordinary revolving door, except that, instead of the usual glass panels, each panel or segment is composed of a series of metal bars. The gate is controlled by a button in the casting office, which button, when pushed, activates an electric current which releases a dog or catch. When the button is released, the dog reengages, stopping the rotation of the gate. The evidence indicates: (a) that, in order to permit access, the control button must be kept depressed during the full…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Nunneley v. Edgar HotelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- Williams v. BridgesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
- Newman v. Los Angeles Transit LinesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
- Beresford v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.California Supreme Court · 1955
- Forman v. Alexander's MarketsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Clemens v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
- Shifrin v. McGuire & Hester Construction Co.California Court of Appeal · 1966
- Philbrick v. WeinbergerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
- Pollock v. Standard Oil Co.California Court of Appeal · 1967