Schultz v. Sussman
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
This appeal is from a judgment entered on a verdict in favor of plaintiff in an action for damages for an alleged malicious assault by defendant upon plaintiff. The .verdict and judgment was for the sum of $11,000. Defendant moved for a new trial, which was denied on condition that plaintiff deduct from the verdict $6,000. Plaintiff filed his consent to such reduction.
Appellant contends that the court erred in denying his motion for a new trial, and also that the court erred in refusing to permit defendant to cross-examine plaintiff regarding other damage suits plaintiff might have…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Green v. SouleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Scott v. Times-Mirror Co.California Supreme Court · 1919
- East Bay Municipal Utility District v. KiefferCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
- Merralls v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1920
- Murphy v. ZwiegCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Maffeo v. HolmesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
- Rather v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
- Davis v. FransonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
- Dunford v. General Water Heater Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1957
- Abney v. CoalwellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.